Mobility and social dimension: fundamentals of the European Higher Education Area and the Bologna process
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5821/ace.14.40.6770Keywords:
Bologna, University residence, ErasmusAbstract
Objective
From the systematic analysis of the content of the documents of the Bologna Declaration (1999) and of the biennial ministerial summits (2001-2015) as well as the revision of European and Spanish university policy documents, it examines the evolution of the Bologna Declaration over two decades, with particular emphasis on the social dimension and mobility.
Methodology
The methodology used has been a comparative analysis of the policies followed in the 2008-2011 period with those followed in 2017.
Conclusions
The analysis shows that twenty years after the Bologna Declaration and the beginning of the process of building the EHEA, it is necessary to continue insisting on overcoming obstacles for effective mobility, especially in the social dimension, understanding that university policies for improving the living conditions of students, among which university housing, require an increase in public spending and a system of scholarships and grants that guarantee equity and equality in access.
Originality
The proposed analysis aims to place access to university housing as an essential element to address the challenges raised by the European Union regarding Higher Education in relation to mobility (recognition of degrees, homologation, cultural and linguistic exchange, ...) and the social dimension (equity, access, equal opportunities, scholarships and grants, ...).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
INTELECTUAL PROTECTION CRITERIA |
At this moment, it is count with the "Oficina Española de Patentes y Marcas", while global protection it is being processed by the World Intelectual Property Organization (OMPI/WIPO). Nevertheless the International Standard Serial Number Office (ISSN) has given the following numbers ISSN: 1886-4805 (electronic version) and 1887-7052 (paper version). All articles will be peer reviewed, using double blind reviewing. |
COPYRIGHT |
The article contents and their comments are authors exclusive liability, and do not reflect necessarily the journal editor commitee's opinion. All ACE published works are subject to the following licence CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 ES http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/ It implies that authors do not hold nor retain the copyright without restrictions but only those included in the licence. |