We are convinced that the arguments surrounding the dissolution of place tend toward the
materialization of a city which continues to amass atopic architectures, architectures that
facilitate the spectacularism of their forms and where the spatial rupture of the city becomes
more discernible. On the other hand, the vindication of the architectural creative process as
anti-historical creates forms of rupture and discomfort, and empowers a new, merely
functionalist, vision. Today architecture is seen as subsidiary to other branches of knowledge,
and, despite its exuberant forms, it retains an illusory autonomy, confined by assumptions that
surpass and depreciate it. Contemporary architecture must reclaim the notion of perpetuity and
permanence, so as to create new memories and contribute to the maintenance of collective
references that solidify our current history’s forms and the forms of a growing city increasingly
difficult to identify. We are interested in the order that we can find by way of examples that
feature a ‘genomic’ sequence, a structure capable of establishing the continuity of facts that
throughout history have determined and configured the city in so many ways. By means of a dichotomous cause and effect process, we may also describe the contemporary city’s form by
clarifying the form of public spaces (their design and position – an operative grammar) and the
relation and articulation between public spaces (an order – an efficient syntax).