Actividades de aprendizaje para sesiones prácticas sobre la construcción en arquitectura
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5821/jida.2021.10541Palabras clave:
capacitación laboral, aprendizaje activo, experiencias reales, tecnologías digitales, aprendizaje integrado en el trabajoResumen
En la actualidad existen numerosas alternativas para el aprendizaje práctico-profesional en la universidad. Escoger el mejor grupo de actividades para un curso específico es un problema crucial multi criterio complejo, que depende de factores de estas alternativas, de las partes implicadas y del contexto. Este artículo tiene el objetivo de hacer una revisión crítica de la literatura sobre estas actividades para mejorar un curso específico sobre arquitectura y su construcción. Se han consultado 264 estudios multidisciplinarios de la base de datos Web of Science. Como resultado se han: (a) clasificado alternativas prácticas aplicables al caso de estudio y (b) listado indicadores para evaluarlas. En consecuencia, se genera un repositorio filtrado e intencionado, de acuerdo con: (1) los contenidos docentes, (2) la taxonomía de Bloom y (3) el método de aprendizaje adecuado para cada caso. Futuras investigaciones prevén desarrollar una herramienta para analizar y optimizar alternativas.
Citas
ALT, D. (2017). “College Students’ Perceived Learning Environment and Their Social Media Engagement in Activities Unrelated to Class Work.” Instructional Science 45(5):623-43.
CARBONE, A.; RAYNER, G.M.; YE, J.; y DURANDET, Y. (2020). “Connecting Curricula Content with Career Context: The Value of Engineering Industry Site Visits to Students, Academics and Industry.” European Journal of Engineering Education 45(6):971-84.
CHICKERING, A.W. y GAMSON, Z.F. (1987). “AAHE Bulletin.” Seven Principles for Good Practice in Undergraduate Education 39(7):3-7.
CHU, SKW.; ZHANG, Y.; CHEN, K.; CHAN, CK.; LEE, CWG.; ZOU, E.; y LAU, W. (2017). “The Effectiveness of Wikis for Project-Based Learning in Different Disciplines in Higher Education.” The Internet and Higher Education 33:49-60.
CLARIVATE. (2021). “Web of Science Core Collection.” Retrieved September 3, 2021 <https://clarivate.com/webofsciencegroup/solutions/web-of-science-core-collection/>
COLOMER, J.; SERRA, T.; CAÑABATE, D.; y BUBNYS, R. (2020). “Reflective Learning in Higher Education: Active Methodologies for Transformative Practices.” Sustainability 12(9).
CSAPÓ, B. y MOLNÁR, G. (2017). “Potential for Assessing Dynamic Problem-Solving at the Beginning of Higher Education Studies.” Frontiers in Psychology 8:2022.
DUFFY, A.P.; HENSHAW, A.; y TROVATO, J.A. (2020). “Use of Active Learning and Simulation to Teach Pharmacy Students Order Verification and Patient Education Best Practices with Oral Oncolytic Therapies.” Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice: Official Publication of the International Society of Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners 1078155220940395.
DUNNETT, K.; GORMAN, M.N.; y BARTLETT, P.A. (2018). “Assessing First-Year Undergraduate Physics Students’ Laboratory Practices: Seeking to Encourage Research Behaviours.” European Journal of Physics 40(1):15702.
ECHARTE, J.M. (2019). “Dimensión Económica y Laboral En La Formación de Los Arquitectos Españoles.” ZARCH (12).
FRANCO, M.; SILVA, R.; y RODRIGUES, M. (2019). “Partnerships between Higher Education Institutions and Firms: The Role of Students’ Curricular Internships.” Industry and Higher Education 33(3):172-85.
GOEZE, A.; ZOTTMANN, J.M.; VOGEL, F.; FISCHER, F.; y SCHRADER, J. (2014). “Getting Immersed in Teacher and Student Perspectives? Facilitating Analytical Competence Using Video Cases in Teacher Education.” Instructional Science 42(1):91-114.
GÓMEZ-POYATO, M.J.; AGUILAR-LATORRE, A.; MARTÍNEZ-PECHARROMÁN, M.M.; MAGALLÓN-BOTAYA, R.; y OLIVÁN-BLÁZQUEZ, B. (2020). “Flipped Classroom and Role-Playing as Active Learning Methods in the Social Work Degree: Randomized Experimental Study.” Social Work Education 39(7):879-92.
HALVARSSON LUNDKVIST, A. y GUSTAVSSON, M. (2018). “Conditions for Employee Learning and Innovation – Interweaving Competence Development Activities Provided by a Workplace Development Programme with Everyday Work Activities in SMEs.” Vocations and Learning 11(1):45-63.
HARDY, J.G.; SDEPANIAN, S.; STOWELL, A.F.; ALJOHANI, A.D.; ALLEN, M.J.; ANWAR, A.; BARTON, D.; BAUM, J.V.; BIRD, D.; BLANEY, A.; BREWSTER, L.; CHENELER, D.; EFREMOVA, O.; ENTWISTLE, M.; ESFAHANI, R.N.; FIRLAK, M.; FOITO, A.; FORCINITI, L.; GEISSLER, S.A.; GUO, F.; HATHOUT, R.M.; JIANG, R.; KEVIN, P.; LEESE, D.; LOW, W.L.; MAYES, S.; MOZAFARI, M.; MURPHY, S.T.; NGUYEN, H.; NTOLA, C.N.M.; OKAFO, G.; PARTINGTON, A.; PRESCOTT, T.A.K.; PRICE, S.P.; SOLIMAN, S.; SUTAR, P.; TOWNSEND, D.; TROTTER, P.; y WRIGHT, K.L. (2021). “Potential for Chemistry in Multidisciplinary, Interdisciplinary, and Transdisciplinary Teaching Activities in Higher Education.” Journal of Chemical Education.
HOU, H.T. (2011). “A Case Study of Online Instructional Collaborative Discussion Activities for Problem-Solving Using Situated Scenarios: An Examination of Content and Behavior Cluster Analysis.” Computers & Education 56(3):712-19.
JACOB, W.J.; SUTIN, S.E.; WEIDMAN, J.C.; y YEAGER, J.I. (2015). “Community Engagement in Higher Education.” Pp. 1-28 in Community Engagement in Higher Education: Policy Reforms and Practice, edited by W. J. Jacob, S. E. Sutin, J. C. Weidman, and J. L. Yeager. Rotterdam: SensePublishers.
KAY, J.; FERNS, S.; RUSSELL, L.; SMITH, J.; y WINCHESTER-SEETO, T. (2019). “The Emerging Future: Innovative Models of Work-Integrated Learning.” International Journal of Work-Integrated Learning 20(4):401-13.
KHLAISANG, J. y SONGKRAM, N. (2019). “Designing a Virtual Learning Environment System for Teaching Twenty-First Century Skills to Higher Education Students in ASEAN.” Technology, Knowledge and Learning 24(1):41-63.
KRISTANTO, A.; MUSTAJI; y MARIONO, A. (2017). “The Development of Instructional Materials E-Learning Based on Blended Learning.” International Education Studies 10(7):10-17.
LAMB, R.; ANTONENKO, P.; ETOPIO, E.; y SECCIA, A. (2018). “Comparison of Virtual Reality and Hands on Activities in Science Education via Functional near Infrared Spectroscopy.” Computers & Education 124:14-26.
LEOPOLD, H. y SMITH, A. (2020). “Implementing Reflective Group Work Activities in a Large Chemistry Lab to Support Collaborative Learning.” Education Sciences 10(1).
LÓPEZ-PÉREZ, M.; VICTORIA, M.; PÉREZ-LÓPEZ, C.; y RODRÍGUEZ-ARIZA, L. (2011). “Blended Learning in Higher Education: Students’ Perceptions and Their Relation to Outcomes.” Computers & Education 56(3):818-26.
MAASSEN, P.; ANDREADAKIS, Z.; GULBRANDSEN, M.; y STENSAKER, B. (2019). The Place of Universities in Society. Hamburg: Körber-Stiftung.
MCLELLAN, H. (2007). “Digital Storytelling in Higher Education.” Journal of Computing in Higher Education 19(1):65-79.
MILLER, E. y KONSTANTINOU, I. (2020). “Investigating Work-Integrated Learning and Its Relevance to Skills Development in Degree Apprenticeships.” Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning 10(5):767-81.
PINTO, C.; MENDONÇA, J.M.; y BABO, L. (2020). “Trends of active-learning teaching practices among engineering students.” Pp. 8580-89 in 14th International Technology, Education and Development Conference. Valencia.
PONS-VALLADARES, O.; GONZÁLEZ-BARROSO, J,M,; LÓPEZ-OLIVARES, R.; y ARIAS, I. (2015). “Educational Project to Improve Problem-Based Learning in Architectural Construction Courses Using Active and Co-Operative Techniques.” Revista de La Construccion 14(2).
PONS-VALLADARES, O., y FRANQUESA, J. (2018). “Actividades y Estrategias de Aprendizaje Activo Para Clases Teóricas En Grupos Numerosos (Active Learning Activities and Strategies for Theoretical Classes in Large Groups).” 1-23.
PONS-VALLADARES, O. y NIKOLIC, J. (2020). “Sustainable Design, Construction, Refurbishment and Restoration of Architecture: A Review.” Sustainability 12(22).
PORTUGUEZ CASTRO, M. y GÓMEZ ZERMEÑO, M.G. (2020). “Challenge Based Learning: Innovative Pedagogy for Sustainability through e-Learning in Higher Education.” Sustainability 12(10).
POZO-LLORENTE, M.T. y POZA-VILCHES, M.F. (2020). “Evaluation of Strengths of Dual Vocational Educational Training in Andalusia (Spain): A Stake on the Future.” Education Sciences 10(12).
ROJAS-LÓPEZ, A.; RINCÓN-FLORES, E.G.; MENA, J.; GARCÍA-PEÑALVO, F.J.; y RAMÍREZ-MONTOYA, M.S. (2019). “Engagement in the Course of Programming in Higher Education through the Use of Gamification.” Universal Access in the Information Society 18(3):583-97.
SÁNCHEZ-APARICIO, L.J.; SÁNCHEZ-GUEVARA, M.C.; GALLEGO SÁNCHEZ-TORIJA, J.; y OLIVIERI, F. (2020). “Buildings 360o: Un Nuevo Enfoque Para La Enseñanza En Construcción.”
SENTHILKUMAR, R. (2019). “Work in Progress: Use of Interactive Simulations in the Active Learning Model in Physics Education for Engineering Students at a College in Oman.” Pp. 1359-62 in 2019 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON).
SHROFF, RONNIE HOMI, FRIDOLIN SZE THOU TING, y WAI HUNG LAM. (2019). “Development and Validation of an Instrument to Measure Students’ Perceptions of Technology-Enabled Active Learning.” Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 35(4).
SWANSON, E.; V MCCULLEY, L.; OSMAN, D.J.; SCAMMACCA LEWIS, N.; y SOLIS, M. (2019). “The Effect of Team-Based Learning on Content Knowledge: A Meta-Analysis.” Active Learning in Higher Education 20(1):39-50.
ZANELDIN, E., WALEED AHMED, y BILAL EL-ARISS. (2019). “Video-Based e-Learning for an Undergraduate Engineering Course.” E-Learning and Digital Media 16(6):475-96.
