Crossing the Plane: Learning Architecture through Performativity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5821/jida.2025.13571Keywords:
performative pedagogy, architectural education, Research by Design, ecosocial crisis, informalityAbstract
This article examines how performative pedagogical practices can reorient architectural education in the face of the contemporary ecosocial crisis. Drawing on three situated experiences—Inmersiones contrastadas, Al margen, and Sin distancia—developed in Venezuela, Colombia, and Chile, it advances a mode of learning that displaces disciplinary representationalism toward corporeal inscription, improvisation, and informality as epistemic agencies. These practices demonstrate that the precarious does not constitute a deficit, but rather a critical operator that intensifies attention and affect, transforming the classroom into a space of sensitive cohabitation. In productive friction with Research by Design, they do not reject its legitimizing impulse but destabilize its teleological formalization, proposing instead a situated rigor grounded in contingency and vulnerability. The article concludes that performing architectural learning is not a methodological complement, but a radical transformation that shapes architects-terrestrial, capable of inhabiting both living and mineralized territories in interdependent ways.
References
Archer, Bruce. 1995. “The Nature of Research.” Co-Design Journal 2 (11): 6–13.
Barad, Karen. 2007. Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham: Duke University Press.
Camnitzer, Luis. 2009. Didáctica de la liberación: Arte conceptualista latinoamericano. Murcia: Cendeac.
De Certeau, Michel. 1990. L’invention du quotidien. 1. Arts de faire. Paris: Gallimard. [Versión en castellano: La invención de lo cotidiano. 1. Artes de hacer. México: Universidad Iberoamericana, 1996.]
Frayling, Christopher. 1993. “Research in Art and Design.” Royal College of Art Research Papers 1 (1): 1–5.
Freire, Paulo. 1997. Pedagogía de la autonomía: Saberes necesarios para la práctica educativa. Madrid: Siglo XXI.
Freire, Paulo. 1997. Pedagogía del oprimido. Madrid: Siglo XXI.
Haraway, Donna. 1995. Ciencia, cyborgs y mujeres: La reinvención de la naturaleza. Madrid: Cátedra.
Haraway, Donna. 2016. Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Durham: Duke University Press.
hooks, bell. 1994. Teaching to Transgress: Education as the Practice of Freedom. New York: Routledge.
Huchzermeyer, Marie. 2011. Cities With ‘Slums’: From Informal Settlement Eradication to a Right to the City in Africa. Cape Town: UCT Press.
Latour, Bruno. 2017. Facing Gaia: Eight Lectures on the New Climatic Regime. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Machado Penso, María Verónica. “Fitoestéticas y fitopoéticas para la arquitectura: habitar la biodiversidad.” Iberoromania, vol. 102 (2025): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1515/iber-2025-2025
Machado, María Verónica. 2025. Estética encubierta. Radiografías de las arquitecturas corporativas. Santiago de Chile: Manuscrito inédito en redacción.
Quijano, Aníbal. 2000. “Colonialidad del poder, eurocentrismo y América Latina.” In La colonialidad del saber: Eurocentrismo y ciencias sociales. Perspectivas latinoamericanas, edited by Edgardo Lander, 201–246. Buenos Aires: CLACSO.
Schön, Donald. 1983. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books.
Till, Jeremy. 2007. “Three Myths and One Model.” In Building Material 17: Research by Design, edited by A. MacLennan, 16–23. Dublin: University College Dublin.
Turner, John F. C. 1976. Housing by People: Towards Autonomy in Building Environments. London: Marion Boyars.
Walsh, Catherine. 2013. Pedagogías decoloniales. Prácticas insurgentes de resistir, (re)existir y (re)vivir. Tomo I. Quito: Abya-Yala.

















