Learning Achievement Assessment Guideline, Design and Implementation

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5821/jida.2018.5466

Abstract

We are presenting the design and implementation of the Training Achievement Assessment Guideline. It is applied at the end of the learning stages and in the process of awarding the architecture degree. This assessment tool was designed by the faculty staff together with an external curricular consultant. It was conceived considering the crossing between Design Courses syllabuses and the graduation profile definition, taking as a starting point the expected achievements established in the Curricular Articulation Diagram. This guideline constitutes an assessment and monitoring tool that establishes the baseline to be achieved by a graduate in order to accomplish the declared graduation profile. It also allows us to inform the different stakeholders (students, teachers and authorities) about how the students are advancing in the learning process. Throughout the implementation year it has proven to be a very useful and relevant tool.

Author Biographies

Cristian Eduardo Muñoz-Díaz, San Sebastián University

Assistant professor at the San Sebastián University. Director of the fabrication workshop FabARQ

Elisa Pérez-de la Cruz, San Sebastián University

Assistant professor at the San Sebastián University

Grace Mallea-Maturana, San Sebastián University

Assistant professor at the San Sebastián University

Cristóbal Noguera-Errázuriz, San Sebastián University

Assistant professor at the San Sebastián University

References

Agencia nacional de evaluación de la calidad y acreditación (2013). Guía de apoyo para la redacción, puesta en práctica y evaluación de los resultados del aprendizaje. Edición ANECA. Madrid, España

Bologna Working Group. (2005) “A Framework for Qualifications of the European Higher Education Areaâ€. Bologna Working Group Report on Qualifications Frameworks (Copenhagen, Danish Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation)

Contreras, G. (2010), “Diagnóstico de dificultades de la evaluación del aprendizaje en la universidad: un caso particular en Chile. Educación y Educadores†[en linea]: [Fecha de consulta: 13 de septiembre de 2017] Disponible en: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=83416998004> ISSN 0123-1294

European Association for Quality Assurance in Higher Education (2009). “Standards and

Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Areaâ€. 3rd ed. Helsinki: ENQA. http://www.enqa.eu/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/ESG_3edition-2.pdf.

Fernández, M. (Sin año) “Bases para la elaboración del proyecto docente. Fundamentación Disciplinar. Universidad de Granada. [Fecha de consulta: 10 de septiembre de 2017] Disponible en http://calidad.ugr.es/pages/secretariados/form_apoyo_calidad/docs/materiales-iniciacion/proyecto-docente/documentos/fundamentaciondisciplinar

Flores, M., Veiga A., Barros, A., & Pereira, D. (2015) “Perceptions of effectiveness, fairness and feedback of assessment methods: a study in higher education, Studies in Higher Educationâ€, 40:9, 1523-1534, DOI: 10.1080/03075079.2014.881348

1080/02602938.2015.1055233

López, V. & Sicilia, A. (2017) “Formative and shared assessment in higher education. Lessons learned and challenges for the future, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Educationâ€, 42:1, 77-97, DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2015.1083535

Medland, E. (2016) “Assessment in higher education: drivers, barriers and directions for change in the UK, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Educationâ€, 41:1, 81-96, DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2014.982072

Miller, A., Imrie, B., & Cox, K. (1998). “Students assessment in higher education. A handbook for assessing performance†Editorial Routedge. New York City, Estados Unidos de Norteamérica. ISBN 0 7494 2797 3

Pereira, D., Flores, M., & Niklasson, L. (2016) “Assessment revisited: a review of research in Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Educationâ€, 41:7, 1008-1032, DOI:

Vicerrectoría Académica, Dirección General de Pregrado (2016). “Orientaciones para la creación o modificación de un programa de asignatura por resultados de aprendizajeâ€. Ediciones Universidad San Sebastián. Santiago, Chile.

Vicerrectoría Académica, Dirección General de Pregrado (2015-1). “Orientaciones para el desarrollo de la docenciaâ€. Ediciones Universidad San Sebastián. Santiago, Chile.

Vicerrectoría Académica, Dirección General de Pregrado (2015-2). “Orientaciones al proceso de evaluación para el aprendizajeâ€. Ediciones Universidad San Sebastián. Santiago, Chile.

Zabalza, M.A. (2012). “Articulación y rediseño curricular: el eterno desafío institucional. Revista de Docencia Universitariaâ€. REDU.Vol.10 (3) Octubreâ€Diciembre. Pp. 17â€48 Recuperado el (03-03-2018) en http://www.redâ€u.net/

Downloads

Published

2018-11-16

Issue

Section

PAPERS