Sympoiesis method for robotic fabrication

collectively prototyping in architecture education

Authors

  • Ricardo Mayor Luque Instituto de Arquitectura Avanzada de Cataluña - IaaC -

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5821/jida.2022.11641

Keywords:

collective design, design/build, manufacturing-driven design, material exploration, robotic fabrication

Abstract

This paper considers how research by design and innovative technologies can join in the development of a collective project in Architectural Education. Based on the book Staying with the Trouble by Donna J. Haraway, this paper establishes a method called Sympoiesis methodology in which a theoretical framework is introduced that consists of collective design, prototype interaction and robotic fabrication. The aim of the paper is to propose a new method in architectural design studio teaching based on collective problem-solving access through making-with prototypes over the implementation of robotic fabrication. Finally, a 6-week seminar studio is presented as a case study, illustrating the proposed framework and helping determine its applicability, impact and limitations, to establish a more profound dialogue between new technologies and digital tools in new participatory learning spaces in the best practices and design in Architectural Education.

Author Biography

Ricardo Mayor Luque, Instituto de Arquitectura Avanzada de Cataluña - IaaC -

Departamento de Fabricación

Lab Assistant / Faculty

References

ACHTEN, H.H. (2002). Requirements for Collaborative Design in Architecture. Timmermans, Harry (Ed.), Sixth Design and Decision Support Systems in Architecture and Urban Planning - Part one: Architecture Proceedings Avegoor, the Netherlands.

ACHTEN, H. (2001). Futures scenario for a collaborative design session and feature list, Stellingwerff, M. and J. Verbeke (eds.), Accolade – Architecture. Collaboration. Design. Delft University Press, Delft, p. 163-167.

ATANASOVA, L.; MITTERBERGER, D.; MITTERBERGER, D.; SANDY, T. & DÖRFLER, K. (2021). Prototype As Artefact - Design Tool for Open-ended Collaborative Assembly Processes. ACADIA 2020: Distributed Proximities / Volume I: Technical Papers [Proceedings of the 40th Annual Conference of the Association of Computer Aided Design in Architecture (ACADIA) ISBN 978-0-578-95213-0]. Online and Global. 24-30 October 2020. edited by B. Slocum, V. Ago, S. Doyle, A. Marcus, M. Yablonina, and M. del Campo. 350-359.

AKIPEK, O.F. & KOZIKOGLU, N. (2007). Prototypes in architectural education: as instruments of integration in the digital era. METU JFA 2007/2, p.169-178.

BABER, K.R; BURRY, J.R.; CHEN, C.; GATTAS, J.M. & BUKAUSKAS, A. (2020). Inventory constrained design of a timber funicular structure. Proceedings of the IASS Annual Symposium 2019 – Structural Membranes 2019 Form and Force 7 – 10 October 2019, Barcelona, Spain C. Lázaro, K.-U. Bletzinger, E. Oñate (eds.).

BOZA, L.E. (2006). (Un) Intended Discoveries Crafting the Design Process. Synthetic Landscapes [Proceedings of the 25th Annual Conference of the Association for Computer-Aided Design in Architecture] p. 150-157.

BRELL-COKCAN, S. & BRAUMANN, J. (2013). Industrial robots for design education: robots as open interfaces beyond fabrication. International Conference on Computer-Aided Architectural Design Futures, Ed. Springer.

CARPO, M. (2017). The second digital turn: design beyond intelligence. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

CHINCHILLA, I. (2020). La ciudad de los cuidados, Madrid. Colección Arquitecturas, La catarata (Asociacion los libros de la catarata).

DENIZ, B. & AÇALYA, A. (2017). Simulating Craftwork in Contemporary Architecture, The Journal of Modern Craft, 10:1, p. 37-57, DOI: 10.1080/17496772.2017.1294324.

GARCÍA VILLALUENGA, Y. “Se acabó la fiesta" La Arquitectura Española de los últimos 20 años" rtve <https://www.rtve.es/play/videos/archivos-tema/archivos-tema-se-acabo-fiesta/1269406/> [Consulta: 20 de Septiembre de 2021]

GRAMAZIO, F. & KOHLER, M. (2008). Digital Materiality in Architecture. Baden: Lars Müller Publishers.

GRAMAZIO, K. & KOHLER, M. (2015). The Robotic Touch: How Robots Change Architecture. Ed. Park Books. 2015.

HERTZOG, T. (2004). Timber Construction Manual. Ed. American Institute of Timber Construction (AITC).

JUNGA, J.H. & LIM, D.G. (2020). Industrial robots, employment growth, and labor cost: A simultaneous equation analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Volume 159, October 2020, p. 120202.

JUTRAZ, A. & ZUPANCIC, T. (2014). The Role of Architect in Interdisciplinary Collaborative Design Studios. DOI 10.15292/IU-CG.2014.02.034-042 | UDK 378.1:72 | SUBMITTED: 06/2014 | REVISED: 07/2014 | PUBLISHED: 10/2014. Author's affiliation: the 1 University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Architecture, Slovenia.

LEACH, N.; TURNBULL, D. & WILLIAMS, C. (2004). Digital tectonics. Chichester: Wiley-Academy.

LOPEZ-PEREZ, D. (2021). R. Buckminster Fuller - Pattern-Thinking. Integral Lars Müller. Zurich, Switzerland.

LATOUR, B. (1983). "Give Me a Laboratory and I will Raise the World", K. Knorr-Cetina y M. Mulkay (eds.), Science. Londres: Sage, p. 141-170.

LAUREN, V.; NGUYEN, L.; GROSSMAN, T.; KERRICK, H.; NAGY, D..; ATHERTON, E; THOMASSON, D.; COTE, N.; BENJAMIN, D.; FITZMAURICE, G. & MENGES, A. (2016). Collaborative Construction: Human and Robotic Collaboration Enabling the Fabrication and Assembly of a Filament-Wound Structure. ACADIA // 2016: POSTHUMAN FRONTIERS: Data, Designers, and Cognitive Machines [Proceedings of the 36th Annual Conference of the Association for Computer Aided Design in Architecture (ACADIA) ISBN 978-0-692-77095-5] Ann Arbor 27-29 October 2016, p. 184-195.

LATOUR, B. (1993). We have never been modern, Harvard, Cambridge. Harvard University Press.

LUKMAN BIN NIK IBRAHIM, N. & UTABERTA, N. (2012). Learning in Architecture Design Studio. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 60, 17 October 2012, p. 30-35.

MAHER, M.L.; PAULINI, M. & MURTY, P. (2011). Scaling Up: From Individual Design to Collaborative Design to Collective Design. Conference paper. Design Computing and Cognition ’10, p. 581-599.

MCCULLOUGH, M. (1996). Abstracting Craft: The practiced Digital Hand. Cambridge Massachusetts. London, England. The MIT Press.

MENGES, A.; SCHWINN, T. & KRIEG, O.D. (2016). Advancing Wood Architecture, A computational approach. ISBN 9781138932999. Published August 22, 2016, by Routledge.

MENGES, A. & WILEY, A. (2012). Material Computation: Higher Integration in Morphogenetic Design. Edited by Achim Menges. ISBN: 978-0-470-97330-1 April 2012, p. 136.

MORITSCH, S. (2017). Craft-Based Design: On Practical Knowledge and Manual Creativity.

MUTLU DANACI, H. (2015). Creativity and Knowledge in Architectural Education.

NANDERA, S.S. (2014-15). The ever-changing role of craft in architecture. University of Sheffield School of Architecture. The thesis was supervised by Carolyn Butterworth. <https://issuu.com/sirdeep/docs/the_ever_changing_role_of_craft_in_> [Consulta: 20 de Septiembre 2021]

NIEDDERER, K. & TOWNSEND, K. (2010). Craft Research: Joining Emotion and Knowledge. The Design Journal, 17:4, 624-647, DOI: 10.2752/175630614X14056185480221

PAULINI, M. & MURTY, MAHER, M.L.P. (2011). Understanding collective design communication in open innovation. The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

PAPAMANOLIS, A. (2018). Prototyping and Architectural Education: An examination of the role of prototypes in the design process.

PINSKI, J.; FAITH KANE, F. & EVANS, M. (20218). Craft-based design for innovation: Potential in novelty, quality and sustainability through hands-on interaction. Artifact: Journal of Design Practice, Volume 5, Number 2, 1 December 2018, p. 3.1-3.20(1).

PRIYA, R.S.; SHABITHA, P. & RADHAKRISHNAN, S. (2020). Collaborative and participatory design approach in architectural design studios. Social Sciences & Humanities Open. Vol. 2, Issue 1, p. 100033.

PYE, D. (1968). The nature and art of workmanship. London: Cambridge, at the University Press.

RETSIN, G.; JIMENEZ, M.; CLAYPOOL, M. & SOLER, V. (2019). Robotic Building: Architecture in the Age of Automation. Ed. Detail.

RISATTI, H. (2007). A theory of craft: function and aesthetic expression. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

SENNETT, R. (2008). The Craftsman. New Haven: Yale University Press.

TANERI, B. & DOGAN, F. (2021). How to learn to be creative in design: Architecture students’ perceptions of design, design process, design learning, and their transformations throughout their education. Thinking Skills and Creativity, vol. 39, p. 100781.

WEINAND, Y. (2016). Advanced Timber Structures. Ed. Birkhäuser.

ZHENG, C. & NITSCHE, M. (2017) Combining Practices in Craft and Design. n, in Storni, C., Leahy, K., McMahon, M., Lloyd, P. and Bohemia, E. (eds.), Design as a catalyst for change - DRS International. Conference 2018, 25-28 June, Limerick, Ireland. <https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2018.537>

Downloads

Published

2022-11-04

Issue

Section

PAPERS