The perception in the review of architectural projects
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5821/jida.2019.8223Abstract
Starting from understanding the architectural design workshop as the academic space where professors and students exchange opinions about architectural project, in addition, to the fact that there are different teaching techniques, feedback on projects, ways of delivering and evaluating evidence of the final process or product of an architectural project. Then, through participant observation, semi-structured interviews and the application of questionnaires to those involved in the workshop, a set of observable situations that should be considered during the exercise of criticism of architectural projects is always sought in the search for the development of the skills of the students and the improvement of their learning. Also, it is sought to open the conversation about actively including the appreciation of the students in the workshop review processes, as well as paying attention to the practical thinking phases of the students in the process of reflection and review of projects.References
ALAGBE, O. (2015). “Difference in grading parameters in architectural schools and its impact on the competency rating of future professionalsâ€. Frontiers of Architectural Research, vol. 4, no. 4, p. 230-236.
ÃLVAREZ VALLEJO, A., DE HOYOS MARTÃNEZ, J. y JIMÉNEZ JIMÉNEZ, J. (2015). “¿Cómo serÃa la enseñanza del tutor en arquitectura?â€. Revista ASINEA 93 Asociación de Instituciones de Enseñanza de la Arquitectura de la República Mexicana. Vol. 93, p. 114-125.
BUCHETTI, A. (2008). “La mayéutica y su aplicación como técnica de aprendizajeâ€. Reflexión académica en Diseño & Comunicación, p. 82-83.
CANABAL, C. y MARGALEF, L. (2017). “La retroalimentación: la clave para una evaluación orientada al aprendizajeâ€. Profesorado. Revista de CurrÃculum y Formación de Profesorado, vol. 21, no. 2, p. 149-170.
ÇIKIS, S. (2009). “Problematization of assessment in the architectural design educationâ€. Revista Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 1, no. 1, p. 2103-2110.
DE LA HARPE, B. (2008). “A model for holistic studio assessment in the creative disciplinesâ€, ATN Assessment Conference 2008, p. 8.
DOMINGO ROGET, Ã. (2013). “Practica Reflexiva para docentesâ€. Revista de la Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, Vol. 2, Núm. 3, p. 277-278.
GUARDIOLA-VICTORIA, A. y PÉREZ-GARCÃA, A. (2017). “El estudiante universitario responsable de su propio aprendizajeâ€. Jornadas de Innovación Docente en Arquitectura JIDA '17, p. 401-412.
HASSANPOUR, B. (2011). “Students’ Perception of the Evaluation System in Architecture Studiosâ€. Revista International Journal of Educational and Pedagogical Sciences, vol. 5, p. 494-500.
LUCERO MÃRQUEZ, J. (2007). “La enseñanza del proceso de diseño arquitectónicoâ€. Anuario CyAD UAM – X México. Vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 14-28.
MENDOZA, J. A. (2014). Intuición. Procesos Cognitivos en el diseño arquitectónico, tesis teórica para obtener el tÃtulo de arquitecto, UNAM, México, <https://repositorio.unam.mx/contenidos/137078> [Consulta: febrero 2019].
RODRÃGUEZ SABIOTE, C., LORENZO QUILES, O. y HERRERA TORRES, L. (2005). “TeorÃa y práctica del análisis de datos cualitativos. Proceso general y criterios de calidadâ€. Revista Internacional de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, vol. XV, núm. 2, p. 133-154.
SANTOS GUERRA, M. Ã. (1993). La evaluación, un proceso de diálogo, compresión de mejora. Archidona.
SOBOLEOSKY, L. (2007). La evaluación en el taller de arquitectura: una mirada exploratoria. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Editorial Nobuko.
SORIANO ROJAS, R. (2002). Investigación-acción en el aula. Enseñanza-aprendizaje de la metodologÃa. Sexta ed. México: Plaza y Valdés Editores.
UTABERTA, N. (2011). “An overview of architecture education in Malaysia a critical analysis of assessment and critique sessions in 2nd year of architecture design studio at Architecture Department, The National University of Malasyaâ€. Revista Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 60, p. 221-227.
UTABERTA, N. (2012). “Upgrading Education Architecture by Redefining Critique Session in Design Studioâ€. Revista Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 102, p. 42-47.
WEBSTER, H. (2005). “The Architectural Review: A study of ritual, acculturation and reproduction in architectural educationâ€. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, vol. 4. p. 265-282.
WEBSTER, H. (2007). “The Assessment of Design Project Work (Summative Assessment)â€. Revista Center for Education in the Built Environment, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 1-10.
